Engagement · Primary Structure

Fractional CMO for AI-oncology and biotech companies

A senior oncology Chief Medical Officer, embedded with one company on the decision arc that determines whether the molecule reaches the next phase — without the cost and calendar of a full-time CMO hire you may not yet need.

Book a 20-minute fit call New to the decision? Why and when to hire a fractional CMO. Most engagements start with a fixed-scope Calibration Sprint.

What a Fractional CMO Is

The senior clinical-regulatory seat, at the fraction of time your stage actually requires.

A fractional Chief Medical Officer is a senior physician-executive who leads the clinical and regulatory strategy of a company part-time, on a contract basis. For an early-stage oncology company, that means the person who owns the eight to twelve decisions in front of the program — endpoint, indication, trial design, and the FDA interactions that gate the next phase — is in the room now, rather than after a nine-month executive search or not at all.

The structure is built for a specific moment: a funded early-stage oncology company — AI-originated or conventional — that has not yet hired its full-time CMO and has a pre-IND or Phase I decision arc immediately in front of it. Embedded with one company, agenda set by the near-term FDA decision arc, for a six-to-eighteen-month commitment. It is priced for reserved capacity and accountability — a defined weekly commitment, named decision rights, a fixed term — on a cash basis, with equity added selectively where the situation warrants it.

A fractional role retires near-term decision risk. It does not build a long-term clinical-regulatory function on the calendar required to build one. If what your company needs is a culture, you need a different hire, on a different clock.

What the Role Covers

Senior judgment on the decisions that determine whether the molecule reaches Phase II.

  • Endpoint and design strategy the FDA can actually review — translating AI-discovered targets and prioritized candidates into endpoint structures, trial designs, and pre-IND positions the agency has precedent to accept; and, where the science calls for it, proposing a reasoned departure — accelerated approval on early response, a novel surrogate, a tumor-agnostic indication, an external control — on terms the agency can engage with.
  • Trial designs that enroll — pressure-testing inclusion/exclusion logic, referral patterns, line-of-therapy windows, and combination-regimen practicality against what community oncologists will actually prescribe, before the protocol is locked.
  • Indication and population choice — where the first program should be aimed, and what the evidence will and will not support.
  • Regulatory translation — putting the science into the language and documentation tier a CDER review division will accept, so the engineering that already exists is legible to the reviewer.
  • Representing the clinical-regulatory story — to the board, to investors, and in the pre-IND and first-in-human interactions themselves.

What the First 90 Days Look Like

A four-phase, twelve-week operating arc.

The operating arc a fractional CMO engagement follows once it converts from the front door. Each phase produces a specific artifact and retires a specific decision. The phases are not rigid — if the science, the data, or the agency forces a reordering, the phases reorder. The deliverables and the retired decisions do not.

Weeks 1–2

Diagnostic

Artifact

One-page Calibration Map: what is known, what is conditionally true, what is asserted but unsupported, and which of the next 8–12 decisions carry the highest regulatory consequence.

Decision retired

Scope of the engagement.

Weeks 3–5

Endpoint & Indication

Artifact

Three linked memos — Endpoint Strategy, Indication and Population Analysis, Pre-IND Target Statement. Output of an expansive-then-decisive arc.

Decision retired

What we take to the agency, and in what population.

Weeks 6–9

Trial Design & FDA Plan

Artifact

Trial-design package + pre-IND briefing-book outline + anticipated reviewer Q&A on both the standard path and the reasoned-departure path.

Decision retired

Trial design submitted for pre-IND.

Weeks 10–12

Translation & Handoff

Artifact

Strategic Theme one-pager (the artifact that travels) + regulatory translation package + next-stage CMO recommendation.

Decision retired

Post-90-day operating model.

Two variants are maintained, one for each kind of company that benefits from this work:

  • Biotech-shaped AI-oncology companies — the canonical case. Program-owners running their own programs toward an IND under their own name. The work shows up at the agency–sponsor interface.
  • AI-platform companies selling into pharma — the parallel arc. Agency-facing work becomes partner-facing work; the platform validates its capabilities so partners can defend the platform's role in their submissions.

Both share the same calibration discipline and the same expansive-then-decisive arc inside Phase 2.

An AI-native developer that acquires or licenses and sponsors its own assets follows the biotech-shaped path for those programs. If the same company also sells capabilities to partners, the partner-facing work follows the platform-shaped path. A hybrid company may require both interfaces.

For the biotech-shaped path, the first hard test is usually the pre-IND meeting: what an oncology pre-IND meeting actually decides — why the package does most of the work, how to spend a limited number of questions, and why the agency's advice is not permission to dose patients.

Who It's For

You and I will be a fit if:

  • Your program is pre-IND or in Phase I, and funded to act on the decisions in front of it — whether the science is AI-originated or conventional.
  • Your team is strong on the science — and on computation, where the program is AI-originated — and already sees clinical-regulatory judgment as the next seat to fill, not the last.
  • The decisions in front of you in the next 90 to 180 days are real, and your program turns on them: endpoint strategy, trial design, FDA interactions, indication choice.
  • You want reserved senior capacity with real decision rights and direct accountability — a structure shaped to the scope, not a name on the deck.

The fractional CMO structure is a small number of companies, deep involvement, and accountability for the outcomes that determine whether the molecule lives or dies — priced for the capacity it reserves and the decisions it retires. What it is not is the retainer: the name on the deck, the board-call contract, the open-ended claim on the calendar that produces nothing a more junior advisor could not.

How It Starts

Through the front door.

A fractional CMO engagement is a real commitment on both sides, so it rarely starts cold. The usual on-ramp is the fixed-scope Calibration Sprint — two weeks, one decision, a fixed fee — which surfaces whether the deeper role is the right structure and, where it is, converts into it.

Calibration Sprint → 90-day operating arc → Fractional CMO.

More on the person in the seat: about Jesús Gómez-Navarro, M.D. · the deeper structures: engagement structures.